Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
lucretius_today_special_series_-_eahp [2023/02/03 20:30] – [Chapter VIII - Sensations, Anticipations, And Feelings] cassiusamicus | lucretius_today_special_series_-_eahp [2023/02/12 09:27] – [Chapter VIII - Sensations, Anticipations, And Feelings] cassiusamicus | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
* Introduction: | * Introduction: | ||
+ | * Podcaster Note: It appears that among the biggest points of this chapter is to show that Epicurus did not assert that we believe only what we see, hear, touch, taste, and smell. Isn't that what is asserted when people think of Epicurus as an Empiricist? One of Dewitt' | ||
* Epicurus was not an empiricist, but people claim that he was and so they ignore the other two legs of the canon, pleasure and pain, which are outside the standard definition o " | * Epicurus was not an empiricist, but people claim that he was and so they ignore the other two legs of the canon, pleasure and pain, which are outside the standard definition o " | ||
* The three criteria are neither three aspects of a single capacity nor yet three discrete capacities which function separately from one another. They act in together and in sequence. | * The three criteria are neither three aspects of a single capacity nor yet three discrete capacities which function separately from one another. They act in together and in sequence. | ||
Line 243: | Line 244: | ||
* Sensation is incapable of memory. It can no more recall a given stimulus than a house can recall the impact of a ball thrown against its wall. The sensation merely registers a stimulus, a melody, for example; it is the memory that says, "I have heard this before"; | * Sensation is incapable of memory. It can no more recall a given stimulus than a house can recall the impact of a ball thrown against its wall. The sensation merely registers a stimulus, a melody, for example; it is the memory that says, "I have heard this before"; | ||
* The confusions are two in number. | * The confusions are two in number. | ||
- | * __The first__ | + | * __The first__ |
* __The second__ | * __The second__ | ||
* The chief ambiguities are also two in number. In the dictum of Epicurus that "all sensations are true" both terms are ambiguous. | * The chief ambiguities are also two in number. In the dictum of Epicurus that "all sensations are true" both terms are ambiguous. | ||
Line 252: | Line 253: | ||
* third, real, in the sense that the sensation corresponds to a real object, such as an ox. | * third, real, in the sense that the sensation corresponds to a real object, such as an ox. | ||
* Epicurus Not An Empiricist | * Epicurus Not An Empiricist | ||
+ | * Focus on how the deductive nature of much Epicurean reasoning, plus anticipations and feelings is not what is generally included in Empiricism | ||
* Anticipations | * Anticipations | ||
* The Account of Laertius | * The Account of Laertius |